Friday, May 31, 2013

Ken’s Decision — with Comments

Ken’s Decision — with Comments

by jmdenison
Oh, my goodness.  I can't believe this is only a draft and I forgot to post this, so I will have to post it again today.
From the Tribunal from May 3, 2013, KDD's decision, and it's just more of down the rabbit hole.
Professor Tarkington from Ind. School of Law got it right when she said the Bar Associations frequently use the standard propounded in New York Times v. Sullivan as a dark aberration of what it is intended to be and that results in decisions very far afield of what New York Times meant the first amendment to be, rendering all or most of the decisions invalid because they infringe too greatly upon the constitutional rights of lawyers.
See link below and let me know if you agree:
jmdenison | May 30, 2013 at 10:41 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p209wH-Ja

Comment   See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.
Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
http://marygsykes.com/2013/05/30/kens-decision-with-comments/

1 comment:

  1. Really nice post and rocking shared to law service , cheers author for your great information and article
    Pleasanton defense attorneys

    ReplyDelete

Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.