Current developments in the Fight to stop the abuse of senior citizens by Court appointed individuals.
The illegal contact that Ms. L. Black attempted to initiate with Ms Dennison is another step in the deterioration of the judicial process. Apparently the three guardians and the ARDC attorney believe that they can run roughshod over everyone . Rules apply to everyone but them! Ms Black is well aware that I represent Ms Dennison as I filed the response to the frivolous ARDC complaint initiated by Ms. Farenga and Ms. Black attempted to tell me that I had a conflict of interest. I do not have any conflict of interest, nor have I ever had one in relation to Ms. Dennison. I do have a severe conflict with Stern, Farenga and Schmiedel as I do not condone their actions.
There is no reason for two Guardian ad litem in the Sykes case if the inventory filed is remotely accurate. How can such a small estate afford paying two guardian ad litem and a plenary guardian? Such is per se unreasonable! Interesting, how does the ARDC overlook the fact that the Court docket does not indicate that the Sodini notices were ever served. As this is jurisdictional it cannot be waived!
Tomorrow we will be filing a motion to dismiss the spurious ARDC complaint filed against me. The Motion is based upon a number of grounds, the most important being the violation of my First Amendment Rights. As these rights are so cherished and important not only am I filing a Civil Rights lawsuit, but the Illinois Supreme Court, States Attorney, Attorney General, and United States Attorney will be requested to investigate the apparent conspiracy to denigrate the Civil Rights of citizens.
This is a serious matter – the first step in the loss of freedom is the loss of the right to speak out!
Ken Ditkowsky
www.ditkowskylawoffice.com
Monday, March 19, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.