 LOOK NOW April 9 2017 Today on Full Measure TV on Guardian Abuse Pass it to more people hurry
It is time to take a look at:
Dr. Sugar has laid out the problem, and the cause for all to see. The time to act is now! The moron in North Korea and the bastard in Syria are threats to others, however, the miscreants portrayed at , AAAPG – Educate – Advocate – Legislate
Probate Sharks, MaryGSykes, NASGA et al are more than potentially targeting you and me - everywhere you turn they are having a profound effect on our daily lives. The high cost of health care and its 700% surcharge should not be lost in the shuffle. The corruption in our courts is aided and abetted by the profitability of this corruption and the fact that the booty is given immunity from taxation.
Three million dollars escaped all taxation in the Mary Sykes case. One million five hundred thousand dollars escaped taxation in the Alice Gore case ******. Eight million escaped taxation in the Tyler case and the list continues. In fact the criminal enterprise is so profitable that Lawyer Disciplinary Commissions such as the Illinois attorney registration and disciplinary commission are devoting hundreds of hours protecting dishonest lawyers and judges from the victim public!
All that we have ever asked the Establishment for was an HONEST INVESTIGATION! We have a better chance of having the butcher of Syria or the monster of North Korea give a positive response than we have in getting an honest shake from the 18 USCA 371 breachers of the public trust!
Ken Ditkowsky
From: kenneth ditkowsky < Sent: Sunday, April 9, 2017 4:39 PM Subject: Re: LOOK NOW April 9 2017 Today on Full Measure TV on Guardian Abuse Pass it to more people hurry
let us define terms.
A judge determines if a litigant has met the standard of proof. It is up to the petitioner to present evidence that proves by a preponderance of the evidence that a particular individual is incompetent and the extent and nature thereof. If the petitioner has not met the standard of proof (clear and convincing in the case of an alleged disabled person) the judge has only one responsibility - DISMISS THE PETITION.
A wired or fixed judge is one who is induced by some non-relevant incentive= such as money, friendship, promises et al to render a decision that the petitioner has met a standard of proof which the aforesaid petition has not done so.
An Incompetent judge is a judge who is biased or does not have the capacity to make an HONEST determination if the standard of proof has been presented. An incompetent judge is not venal - however, the questioning of just how such a judge reached the bench.
The distinctions are important. The guardianship appointment is necessary in many cases - not the hundreds of thousands in which it is being used for elder cleansing and unjust enrichment of certain criminal health care providers/ An easy test of competency is to ask three questions:
Thus, if Mary Sykes knew that her husband had died and she had two daughters surviving - she met the test criteria 1. (Mary met this test when she filled out a Petition for a Protective order against her older daughter (who also was appointed her plenary guardian as the Petition for a Protective order was hidden). Mary met test 2 with color's flying when she on her own ascertained correctly that her older daughter had stolen several thousand dollars from her. She met test 3 when she figured out how to obtain a Petition for an order of Protection and also when she personally did her own banking.
As the standard is so high - due to the Constitutional protections of both the State and Federal Jurisdiction - Judge Maureen Connor's culpability is also noted from the Common Law Record (court file) as not only did she shirk her basic responsibility by ignoring these facts and by allowing one of the guardian ad litem to recommend a doctor who had no qualms about perjury and open and notorious violation of Civil Rights. This subordination of perjury should be noted in the August 2009 Transcript of Proceedings in case 09 P 4585. (Obviously - Jerome Larkin knew or should have known of this intentional violation of Mary Sykes' Constitutional Rights - and his overt act of trying to intimidate both JoAnne Denison and I not to call this perfidy, fraud and clearly wrongful behavior to the attention of Law Enforcement)
If Mary knew that she had a Bank account, a Safety deposit Box, owned her own home, etc - she met the test criteria 2.
Ken Ditkowsky
| |||||||||
Pages
▼
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting.
Your comment will be held for approval by the blog owner.